There is a sordid history of this, and wherever it happens in the world, it is bound to provoke conflict. But one should always be suspicious of those looking to move boundaries around. This has some positives: public participation is explicitly spelt out in the Bill, and there is an appeals process. The Authority will allow aggrieved parties and communities to appeal demarcation decisions without going to court and hopefully avoid some of the violent protests that have accompanied boundary shifts in the past. This is intended to minimise the disruptive effect of significant boundary changes.Īnother major change introduced in the new Bill is the Demarcation Appeals Authority, something lacking in existing legislation. If it does, the MDB must do so at least three years before the next elections. The MDB may only make boundary decisions that move a whole ward in a municipality once every ten years. The new Bill requires extensive public participation prior to demarcation and obligates the MDB to publish its reasons for any changes (not currently a requirement). It disqualifies political party office bearers and full-time employees of organs of state from being members of the board (though it is not difficult to see how this could be side-stepped – by simply resigning a political position). is that boundary is the dividing line or location between two areas while demarcation is the act of marking off a boundary or setting a limit, notably by belligerents signing a treaty or ceasefire. The changes it introduces empower the MDB to borrow money, generate revenue, and strengthen corporate governance. As nouns the difference between boundary and demarcation. Representations regarding changes to municipal boundaries. Once enacted, the Independent Municipal Demarcation Authority Bill will replace the current Local Government: Municipal Demarcation Act. Provincial boundary demarcations are a competence of Parliament through a constitutional amendment. The authors proposed a moratorium on all amalgamations until more definitive results emerged, more education for councillors, and more thorough investigations prior to mergers.Īnother DMB study into the reasons for demarcation requests shows four broad motivations: governance and functionality, the interdependence of people, communities and economies, spatial and development planning, and financial and administrative capacity. From the 284 municipalities in 2000, the country currently has a total of 257 municipalities after the municipal amalgamations carried out in 2006, 20.Īccording to section 24 of the Municipal Demarcation Act, boundary re-determinations should result in municipalities that fulfil the objectives laid out in the Constitution, most importantly, better service delivery.Ī DMB research paper from June 2021 finds that “amalgamating municipalities did not result in improved service delivery.” Those amalgamated municipalities that were studied remained financially distressed. The Local Government Municipal Demarcation Act of 1998 gave birth to the Municipal Demarcation Board, which was established and mandated to demarcate municipal boundaries of the entire territory of the Republic. At that time, there were 1,262 local government bodies which were amalgamated into 843 local authorities, which were thereafter called municipalities. Although incorporating social science knowledge into border management cycles remains limited, it appears to have increased over the past decade.There is an existing structure known as the MDB, which was established in 1999 to determine municipal boundaries for the 1995-96 local elections. This article aims to raise awareness of the significance of incorporating the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework concept into the Joint Border Committee’s (JBC) effective practice of interstate border determination in Peninsular Malaysia. The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IAD), proposed by Elinor Ostrom, an American political scientist specializing in institutional behaviour, is the most applicable framework for reforming guidelines. Understanding the action principle that guides an effective decision-making process among the institutions involved is necessary to improve a policy. Enhancing border management policies appears to be a crucial aspect of the state border nations’ proposal for interstate border governance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |